欢迎访问润滑与密封官方网站!

咨询热线:020-32385313 32385312 RSS EMAIL-ALERT
点接触混合润滑中两种求解模型的比较
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划(2018YFB2000604);国家自然科学基金项目(51805031)


Comparison of Two Solution Models in Point Contact Mixed Lubrication
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    混合润滑是典型零部件主要的润滑状态,根据表面形貌表征方式的不同,混合润滑模型一般分为统计学模型和确定性模型两类。为研究2种模型求解粗糙表面点接触混合润滑性能的差异,通过基于平均流量模型和GW模型的统计模型、基于统一Reynolds方程的确定性模型,分析并比较不同表面粗糙度、卷吸速度、载荷以及润滑油环境黏度时2种模型预测油膜厚度和粗糙峰承载比的吻合性。结果表明:随着粗糙度的增大,2种模型所得粗糙峰承载比的差别变大;随着卷吸速度或环境黏度的增大,2种模型所得膜厚的差别变大;低载荷时2种模型所得油膜厚度和承载比的吻合性均优于高载荷。

    Abstract:

    Mixed lubrication is the main lubrication state of typical parts.According to different surface roughness characterization methods,mixed lubrication models are generally classified into two categories,one is statistical model,and the other is deterministic model.In order to study the difference between the two models in solving the point contact mixed lubrication of rough surface,the statistical model based on the average flow model and the GW model and the deterministic model based on the unified Reynolds equation were adopted to predict the oil film thickness and the asperity load ratio under different surface roughness,rolling speed,load and environmental viscosity of lubricating oil,and the consistency between the two models was compared.The results show that with the increase of roughness,the difference of asperity load ratio between the two models becomes larger.With the increase of rolling speed or environmental viscosity,the difference of film thickness between the two models becomes larger.The consistency between the oil film thickness and the asperity load ratio of the two models under low load is better than that under high load.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王旭,梁 鹤,王文中.点接触混合润滑中两种求解模型的比较[J].润滑与密封,2022,47(2):88-95.
WANG Xu, LIANG He, WANG Wenzhong. Comparison of Two Solution Models in Point Contact Mixed Lubrication[J]. Lubrication Engineering,2022,47(2):88-95.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-05-20
  • 出版日期: 2022-02-15